The Portal
  • 🌀Welcome to The Portal
  • About us
    • 👁️‍🗨️Introduction
    • 🚀Why $PORTAL ?
    • 🪄The Team
    • ✨Our Features
  • The Masterplan
    • 🛠️Getting set up
      • 📝RoadMap
      • 🧑Marketing Plan
  • Project Evaluation
    • 🎨The need for Transparency
    • 🖥️Our methodology
  • Community
    • 🌐Web
    • 🐦Twitter
    • 💬Telegram
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Project Evaluation

Our methodology

PreviousThe need for Transparency

Last updated 2 years ago

Keep in mind: The Portal will not under any circumstances do paid promotion of tokens , every evaluation you will see posted will have gone through the same requirements using our evaluation grid .

Evaluation Grid

In order to guarantee maximum transparency for the community, we have put together an evaluation grid composed by the following elements :

The average Past Performance of the Last 3 Projects if any . Ranking Weight : 20% when applied

string | ComponentClass<any, any> | FunctionComponent<any>

Is utility real ? Only applies to Utility projects Ranking weight : 15%

Total Tax Amount in / out Weight : 10%

How hyped is the project ? Socials , engagement rate, bots vs human interaction Weight: 15%

Avg Lifetime Ranking weight : 10% Only applies when previous data

Average Market Cap after normal Taxes Weight: 10% Only applies if previous history

Marketing Plan - Callers - Socials - Marketing Budget allocation Ranking weight : 10%

Material quality : - Website - Whitepaper - Roadmap Ranking weight : 12.5%

🖥️
Example of Table used for Ape Ratio Calculation (ranking weight values subject to change)